A Curious Eye

A Curious Eye

My name is Ben. I'm a 21 year-old senior at WWU in Bellingham, WA.
I post my favorite news from all around the web.
Topics you'll see:
Queer - Liberalism - Activism - Student Issues- Public Transportation - Peace - Environmentalism - Politics - Law - Atheism - Vegetarianism - Feminism - Sex Positivity - Philosophy.
I've been told my gayness is only matched by my enthusiasm.

dreams-from-my-father:

windupbirdchronicle:

cognizingconsciousness:

What Number Is Halfway Between 1 and 9? Is It 5 — Or 3?
Ask adults from the industrialized world what number is halfway between 1 and 9, and most will say 5. But pose the same question to small children, or people living in some traditional societies, and they’re likely to answer 3.
Cognitive scientists theorize that that’s because it’s actually more natural for humans to think logarithmically than linearly: 30 is 1, and 32 is 9, so logarithmically, the number halfway between them is 31, or 3. Neural circuits seem to bear out that theory. For instance, psychological experiments suggest that multiplying the intensity of some sensory stimuli causes a linear increase in perceived intensity.
(click here to read the rest of the article)
This is a freaking awesome study, by the way.

I guess nobody answered 4.5

wow *_*

well technically 4.5 is half of 9, therefore it’s halfway between 0 and 9.

dreams-from-my-father:

windupbirdchronicle:

cognizingconsciousness:

What Number Is Halfway Between 1 and 9? Is It 5 — Or 3?

Ask adults from the industrialized world what number is halfway between 1 and 9, and most will say 5. But pose the same question to small children, or people living in some traditional societies, and they’re likely to answer 3.

Cognitive scientists theorize that that’s because it’s actually more natural for humans to think logarithmically than linearly: 30 is 1, and 32 is 9, so logarithmically, the number halfway between them is 31, or 3. Neural circuits seem to bear out that theory. For instance, psychological experiments suggest that multiplying the intensity of some sensory stimuli causes a linear increase in perceived intensity.

(click here to read the rest of the article)

This is a freaking awesome study, by the way.

I guess nobody answered 4.5

wow *_*

well technically 4.5 is half of 9, therefore it’s halfway between 0 and 9.

(via aglitteryfool)

  1. precalcproject reblogged this from cognizingconsciousness
  2. 00139600 reblogged this from le-kif-kif
  3. midgetmonkey reblogged this from talkingshrimp
  4. themargatron reblogged this from death-on-a-pale-horse
  5. dreamsaremeantforopeneyes reblogged this from lettersiarrange
  6. lettersiarrange reblogged this from le-kif-kif
  7. death-on-a-pale-horse reblogged this from imjustgladtobehappy
  8. crayolasaurus reblogged this from superhusbandslove
  9. superhusbandslove reblogged this from angrybrownbaby
  10. im-ho-tep reblogged this from theinfectionwithin
  11. theinfectionwithin reblogged this from imjustgladtobehappy
  12. spinejelly reblogged this from metaconscious
  13. kuh-thar-sis reblogged this from cognizingconsciousness
  14. kissyouineyegulps reblogged this from thisismymoon
  15. raspberryfeministbarbie reblogged this from thisismymoon
  16. thisismymoon reblogged this from angryeyed and added:
    whoa cool
  17. steamdrivenfaith reblogged this from lepetitmortpourmoi
  18. angryeyed reblogged this from lepetitmortpourmoi and added:
    People living in small-scale societies = children = HUMAN NATURE fucking idiots.
  19. ministryofsillykisses reblogged this from kibibyte
  20. mistahpottah reblogged this from bencrowther
  21. bencrowther reblogged this from aglitteryfool and added:
    well technically 4.5 is half of 9, therefore it’s halfway between 0 and 9.
  22. aglitteryfool reblogged this from le-kif-kif
  23. comma-ofsilence reblogged this from le-kif-kif
  24. hotcocoabangbang reblogged this from uncomplicatednature